for me it’s double mcchicken
1 Like
“for me, it’s the mcgangbang - a mcchicken between 2 mcdoubles.”
- Sergey
2 Likes
How do you plan to bridge the gap between the above statement, and the following?
I voted yes.
I expect a similar announcement by Watcher.Guru 
5 Likes
I meant I am not a developer for any blockchain, I am an investor first and foremost. I do have programming skills, especially smart contracts, but my background is finance.
I will need education from and collaboration with devs here. This is why I was mentioning earlier I will need to review all technical documentation on the Network so I have a thorough and comprehensive understanding before engaging CL.
I have a lot of experience with Chainlink smart contracts but we will be relying heavily on CL for full e2e integration. Partnership with CL is the make-or-break step here. If approved, they will be helping at every step in the process.
1 Like
are you planning on splitting a portion of the 5K Znn/50K Qsr with the CL Team or do you intend for them to come up with their own ask?
I am definitely willing to contribute these AZ funds to CL integration, but really I have no way to accurately estimate what the associated partnership cost could be.
Why not just sort this first then resubmit once full scope is known. Will save a lot of back and forth + troll accusations
You seem a kinda straight.
How do we know if you are really gay?
4 Likes
+1 .
I still think the full scope is well-defined, and I stand by it. The first step is to engage Chainlink Labs – something only an “official” email and/or X account can do, per the response to my original request to them a few days ago.
Based on previous comments above, it seems at this point my proposal diverges from typical Pillar-only consensus, as the parties responsible for the official Zenon accounts will have to consent to this collaboration with CL.
Let’s just get a quorum of pillars in a chat with him.
Tell him that’s like trying to get a chat with Satoshi… but we can get a quorum of governance to pass whatever he needs. Also, that feels like a pretty cold response from a friendly. I am sure your relationship can transcend these arbitrary requirements
My connections at CL are not working on the onboarding team at all, they are both developers on the Ops side, and their technical knowledge will be invaluable if a partnership is reached. This email was from a random person in the onboarding team that I have no connection to.
When I first brought this up to my friend, he told me all onboarding partners have to follow the proper avenue, starting with contact submission here:
What is EovE7Kj up to these days? Will the CL integration work on UnikernelZ?
Who will pay the fees?
- Satoshi
- Kaine
- ProfZ
- Jack
- Elon
- Lil Jack
- qPP
- Poon
- Shazz
- Chadass
- None of the above
0
voters
your current bridge requires a fee which the bridge user pays. why not the same for offchain usage, implement fees at the upstream router or dapp?
You cannot be serious… None of these things bring any actual value or utility to the network.
Thanks for the proposal.
paid in the form of $link tokens?
1 Like
Zir Gay, I like your senses of initiative and humor. I invite you to load up on ZNN at this legendary entry point and join the community. Probably re-anonymize and create a new alt. :cheers: