We could split the current rewards from wznn/eth and use half for new wznn/sol and then add some for wqsr/sol incentives. Both only need to be for a window of time months up to a year and then should re-assess.
Regarding QSR, I don’t think we should spread our resources/rewards. If anything, I’d say allocate a VERY small amount of rewards for a SOL/wQSR pool in order to support swaps of 150 QSR with minor slippage.
I will also refer to this previous post on the topic:
base is another option. A reputable source weighed in saying SOL is overwhelmingly memes -which can be used as an argument in favor or against it.
I’m seeing BASE come up in my feed now.
My general sense is that people who favor base would be more amicable to going over to SOL if they want to buy wZNN, in contrast to SOL users who would see porting over to base as more high friction.
I also tend to see more people speaking in term of SOL on my feed.
This is my subjective sense but the stats do support sol being where the action is. I hope to hear more opinions.
Option C would be to get more aggressive and go for both base and sol.
Let’s add more chains. Our website has placeholders for literally every dex in existence including fantom, avalanche, polygon, etc. We are smart enough to realize base/solana are taking market share over those, so we pivot, but no reason to be single chain bridge especially when ETH fees are ridiculous.
I would also recommend that we deploy wZNN to TRON. I think TRC-20 is poised to see a huge growth in the near future, given the recent tether mint on TRX.
Let’s get a sense for which chains have the most support.
Which chains? (Multiple select)
Solana
Base
Tron
Arbitrum
Avax
Polygon
0voters
How many chains do you think we should add? How to incentivize the pools, is a factor here. The more chains we add, the more spread out the LP rewards will be. Therefore the LP pools are likely to be more thin / volatile / potentially discouraging to large trades. Please comment to provide additional opinions on this factor.
Any member of the community can easily list wZNN and wQSR on all chains supported by the wormhole bridge.
However there are some minor disadvantages:
token is owned by the wormhole bridge, which means we’d have to get in touch with most platforms to update the details of the token since we can’t prove ownership. However some accept the deployed address for making changes
bridging back to native ZNN and QSR will require going thru 2 bridges, so the UX might suck
adding a new pair to the liquidity staking will require bridging the LP token thru 2 bridges
if we ever want to bridge directly to any of the networks we might end up with 2 tokens
relying on the security of wormhole
And the advantages
very fast listing (1 hour)
no extra efforts for orchestrators
no extra development required
absolutely anyone can do this, there’s no need to wait for HCT to do it