Hi. i have started to lay out the phases. you can find it in the last section of the readme file on the github link. i fully agree: 5k is too much and i will not insist on it! you are right: the crypto stuff is the challenge, the rest is more or less tons but simpler work regarding the apis (ws calls, json parsing, etc).
for me it was important to have this discussion and i was fully aware that by me simply hitting max this discussion will follow. i think it is important to have this open discussion and transparency on how we value projects.
You should make sure that you define comprehensive unit tests for the wallet stuff. With results that are verifiable for non-professionals, but also reproducible for other devs. Make that an integral part of your deliverables
I assume this needs to be resubmitted w/ a new budget correct? Not sure if there is a feature to adjust budget mid-vote that restarts the clock / vote counter?
Hey guys, I voted no with the understanding @2bonahill will be resubmitting with additional information and additional support for the cost estimate. Sounds like the community does support this so looking forward to a resubmission. Thx!
That’s right. Tried to delete my submission, but that doesn’t work. So let’s wait for this voting period to end and I can then resubmit. Absolutely okay for me, i will continue working on the SDK anyway
Will do so, probably tomorrow. Have set together an overview with the phases and efforts per phase. I will multiply the hours by $100, as suggested on this forum and calculate the amount of ZNNs.
On top of that I will make the repo public. First use cases are already working.
I like this. It’s clear, the objectives and timeline are well defined (though I dont get the technical wooha- the other developers will comment on that), the budget has been revised in line with the hourly rate proposed by the community. It’s a yes from me. Should I just change my vote here or do we create a new poll @0x3639 ?
