[ANN] i n e r t i a - NoM Smart Contracts

@EovE7Kj can I please ask that you re lodge the AZ again now that the majority of concerns around payment have been addressed?

3 Likes

Given the recent pushback to proposals, the professor has decided take a sabbatical from the forum and AZ. Any of my work done on this network will remain in my own domain until it is ready for the community (or vise-versa)

I appreciate the interactions and hope to reconnect when the time is right.

11 Likes

Mate just stick around, resubmit and lobby for support. Dont let some mouthbreathers discourage you.

4 Likes

Sir, I wanted to apologize for any of my behavior that you feel was unfair or rude.

Let me explain what happened. You posted that AZ. I started to look at the commit you posted and I could clearly see the roadmap of the work. It was like the first step in a 10 mile hike, but I did not fully appreciate that at that time. I asked some questions about the AZ and the response was not clear to me. I asked some devs to take a look and they were equally perplexed because no one understood this was just the very start of your work. Of course it did not run.

It appeared to me (and I think others) that first commit was the basis for a full AZ request. That did not seem right and we started to push back. You went full Linus. We went full retard. And here we are.

Under normal circumstances the community would have rallied behind your AZ and pushed to get it approved, like we did on the last one. Because of the interactions here the community was not so keen on pushing, and it failed. However, it did not fail because we don’t support the work.

We want to help you. We want to understand your work without being retarded interns. Meanwhile, some new devs are proposing work that make certain assumptions about what a Sentinel is. I believe these assumptions are not consistent with the WP and probably your work. But I’m not sure.

We want to make sure we don’t have two different teams working on Sentinels assuming they do different things. Meanwhile, both teams are preparing to submit for AZs that conflict with each other. We want to avoid this for obvious reasons.

So I would like to help you coordinate your activities with other devs so: (1) they understand your work, and (2) to avoid two teams working on sentinels while thinking they do different things.

We both want the same thing - for Zenon to succeed.

{"zenon":true}

DM me on matrix if you want help @deeznnutz:zenon.chat and thanks to @Stark for solving the problem.

import base64
import gzip

encoded_string = "H4sIAAAAAAAAA8tIzcnJV0jMyUzNK+YqycgsVgAi1/wyV3PvLD0ucwNLM2MjHQVlEz0FLgChcDRLKwAAAA=="

# Decode base64 string
decoded_string = base64.b64decode(encoded_string)

# Decompress gzip data
decompressed_string = gzip.decompress(decoded_string)

print(decompressed_string.decode("utf-8"))  # Output: {"zenon":true}
7 Likes

For the record, I voted NO exclusively for this reason:

I fully support @EovE7Kj’s work and look forward to developing a hello wolrd zApp in the future.

Also shoutout to @0x3639 for the tactful response ^^

3 Likes

On behalf of the rest of us retards thank you for this sers

1 Like

Rugged
https://github.com/EovE7Kj

Ironic to see you use a term for scamcoins when all I have been trying to do is legitimize this project

5 Likes

#Bullieve

In a generic sense - it’s 404.

I hope we see you again and we can support your work. I also hope we can coordinate your work, while you advance it alone. In the meantime, other developers are making new assumptions about functions sentinels can perform.

I also wanted to point out that maintainers of go-zenon are starting to establish review criteria and it would be great if we can find a way to give you the space you want while maintaining some level of coordinating with the rest of the project. See George’s criteria. I hope others publish their criteria too.

https://zenon.wiki/index.php/User:George

My offer stands to help you coordinate your work with others in the community while giving you space.

4 Likes

Translation:

I used that word not because I believe it, but to disprove it.

we make puzzles too!! :rofl:

I think its a disservice to progress if we are discouraging contributors who have a track record of completing previous tasks.

4 Likes